A. Imminence of threat to the ecosytem under consideration, scored on a 1 to 3 scale:
1. Low to moderate degree of threat at present
2. Degree unknown
3. Highly threatened
B. Distribution of chimpanzees, scored on a 1 to 3 scale:
1. Confirmed by experts
2. Confirmed by local people
3. Unknown, but very probable in view of the ecosystem
C. Overall primate species richness in project area, scored on a 1 to 3 scale:
1. 5 or fewer species
2. 6-9 species
3. 10 or more species
D. Population size, scored on a 1 to 3 scale:
1. Less than 100
2. More than 100
3. Unknown
E. Area to be surveyed, scored on a 1 to 3 scale:
1. Less than 100 sq-km
2. 100-1000 sq-km
3. More than 1,000 sq-km
F. Availability of qualified and enthusiastic researchers:
1. Candidates not available
2. Candidates available but without adequate financial support
3. Long-term research in progress

A. General environmental conditions, scored on a 1 to 3 scale:
1. Very good
2. Good
3. Poor
B. Imminence of threat to chimps by hunting, trapping etc., scored on a 1 to 3 scale:
1. Low degree of threat at present
2. Moderately threatened
3. Highly threatened
C. Overall primate species richness in project area, rated on a 1 to 3 scale:
1. 5 or fewer species
2. 6-9 species
3. 10 or more species
D. Population size of chimpanzees, scored on a 1 to 3 scale:
1. More than 500
2. 100-500
3. Less than 100
E. Geographical or ecological uniqueness:
1. Part of a continuous distribution
2. Isolated from other populations
3. Ecologically "important" habitat
F. Availability of qualified and enthusiastic researchers:
1. Candidates not available
2. Candidates available but without adequate financial support
3. Long-term research in progress

A. Presence or absence of other top-priority wildlife such as gorillas or okapis:
0. Absent
1. Present
B. General environmental conditions, scored on a 1 to 3 scale:
1. Very good
2. Good
3. Poor
C. Overall primate species richness in project area, rated on a 1 to 3 scale:
1. 5 or fewer species
2. 6-9 species
3. 10 or more species
D. Population size of chimpanzees, scored on a 1 to 3 scale:
1. Less than 100
2. 100-500
3. More than 100
E. Tourist potential, scored on a 0 to 3 scale:
0. Difficult access; no good campsite available
1. Difficult access; good campsite available
2. Easy access; no good campsite available
3. Easy access; good campsite available
F. Attitude of local government to ecotourism:
0. Not positive
1. Positive

A. Presence or absence of other top-priority wildlife such as gorillas or okapis:
0. Absent
1. Present
B. General environmental conditions, scored on a 1 to 3 scale:
1. Poor
2. Good
3. Very good
C. Imminence of threat to chimps by hunting, trapping etc., scored on a 1 to 3 scale:
1. Low degree of threat at present
2. Moderately threatened
3. Highly threatened
D. Overall primate species richness in project area, rated on a 1 to 3 scale:
1. 5 or fewer species
2. 6-9 species
3. 10 or more species
E. Population size of chimpanzees, scored on a 1 to 3 scale:
1. Less than 100
2. 100-500
3. More than 100
F. Chimpanzee range extends over national boundary:
1. No
2. Yes
G. Tourist potential, scored on a 0 to 3 scale:
0. Difficult access; no good campsite available
1. Difficult access; good campsite available
2. Easy access; no good campsite available
3. Easy access; good campsite available
H. Attitude of local government to ecotourism:
0. Not positive
1. Positive

1. Name & address of person completing this questionnaire: